Development Intent
AtlasLambethOfficersLaura Reid
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›Laura Reid
Case officer · Lambeth Planning

Laura Reid.

Last recorded decision Nov 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Lambeth with an approval rate of 68% across 171 decided planning applications, spanning 16 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer171 decisions68% approvalSave
Lambeth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
171
Applications
2021–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%68%202269%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate68% · 57th of 72
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Laura Reid's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Laura Reid decided — 145 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

Q11Building alterations and extensionsLambeth plan
98 times cited
Q5Local distinctivenessLambeth plan
91 times cited
Q8Design quality: construction detailingLambeth plan
70 times cited
Q2AmenityLambeth plan
46 times cited
Q22Conservation areasLambeth plan
31 times cited
NPPFNPPF
28 times cited
Q20Statutory listed buildingsLambeth plan
22 times cited
T3CyclingLambeth plan
10 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
29
63%
28
85%
19
61%
18
82%
17
59%
15
43%
14
79%
8
100%
6
83%
3
0%
3
33%
3
67%
2
0%
2
100%
2
50%
2
100%
29
63%
28
85%
19
61%
Show all 16 rows
18
82%
17
59%
15
43%
14
79%
8
100%
6
83%
3
0%
3
33%
3
67%
2
0%
2
100%
2
50%
2
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
23/00815/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-05-16
23/00715/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-05-10
23/00815/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-05-16
23/00715/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-05-10
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 171 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Baily Garner LLP
2. Resi
3. AK-Studios
4. Design Squared Ltd
At a glance
OfficerLaura Reid
BoroughLambeth
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications171 (2021–23)
Approval rate68%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lambeth planning register and published decision notices, 2021–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lambeth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.