Development Intent
AtlasLambethOfficersNesha Burnham
Case officer · Lambeth Planning

Nesha Burnham.

Last recorded decision Jul 2024 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Lambeth with an approval rate of 56% across 21 decided planning applications, spanning 13 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer21 decisions56% approvalSave
Lambeth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
21
Applications
2020–24
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate56% · 66th of 72
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Nesha Burnham's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Nesha Burnham decided — 15 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

Q5Local distinctivenessLambeth plan
10 times cited
Q8Design quality: construction detailingLambeth plan
10 times cited
Q11Building alterations and extensionsLambeth plan
8 times cited
Q2AmenityLambeth plan
5 times cited
NPPFNPPF
2 times cited
T1Sustainable travelLambeth plan
2 times cited
Q20Statutory listed buildingsLambeth plan
2 times cited
H5Housing standardsLambeth plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–24.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
24/02155/LB
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2024-09-02
24/01888/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-08-30
24/02155/LB
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2024-09-02
24/01888/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-08-30
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 21 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Architect Jose Soto
2. Cushman & Wakefield
3. Alan Piper Consultancy
4. SiX Architecture LLP
At a glance
OfficerNesha Burnham
BoroughLambeth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications21 (2020–24)
Approval rate56%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lambeth planning register and published decision notices, 2020–24. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lambeth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.