Development Intent
AtlasRedbridgeOfficersX Holly Ganderton
Planning Atlas›Redbridge›X Holly Ganderton
Case officer · Redbridge Planning

X Holly Ganderton.

Last recorded decision Oct 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Redbridge with an approval rate of 69% across 546 decided planning applications, spanning 22 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer546 decisions69% approvalSave
Redbridge · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
546
Applications
2020–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%67%202066%202181%202261%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate69% · 26th of 32
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of X Holly Ganderton's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications X Holly Ganderton decided — 16 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

LP26and LP27). This will enable a largeRedbridge plan
16 times cited
D12London Plan
10 times cited
LP38Protecting Trees and Enhancing the LandscapeRedbridge plan
9 times cited
LP32Sustainable Design and ConstructionRedbridge plan
8 times cited
G7London Plan
8 times cited
LP30Household ExtensionsRedbridge plan
7 times cited
D7London Plan
7 times cited
LP23Cycle and Car Parking StandardsRedbridge plan
7 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
46
74%
43
65%
43
76%
36
75%
35
66%
28
72%
28
68%
28
56%
27
62%
25
80%
23
67%
22
73%
19
76%
18
67%
18
93%
17
71%
16
57%
15
53%
15
73%
14
64%
14
71%
11
70%
46
74%
43
65%
43
76%
Show all 22 rows
36
75%
35
66%
28
72%
28
68%
28
56%
27
62%
25
80%
23
67%
22
73%
19
76%
18
67%
18
93%
17
71%
16
57%
15
53%
15
73%
14
64%
14
71%
11
70%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
0122/23
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2023-10-30
1973/23
Householder
Approved
2023-10-30
0122/23
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2023-10-30
1973/23
Householder
Approved
2023-10-30
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 546 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Civils Consulting Ltd
2. Ken Judge & Associates Ltd
3. Livarch Ltd
4. arks design studio limited
At a glance
OfficerX Holly Ganderton
BoroughRedbridge
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications546 (2020–23)
Approval rate69%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Redbridge planning register and published decision notices, 2020–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Redbridge decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.