Development Intent
AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesOfficersLuca Pizzingrilli
Case officer · Richmond Upon Thames Planning

Luca Pizzingrilli.

Active — last recorded decision Mar 2026

A case officer at Richmond Upon Thames with an approval rate of 89% across 9 decided planning applications, spanning 4 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer9 decisions89% approvalSave
Richmond Upon Thames · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
9
Applications
2024–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%100%202480%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate89% · 9th of 67
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Luca Pizzingrilli's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Luca Pizzingrilli decided — 7 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D12London Plan
3 times cited
6Sustainable Construction StandardsRichmond Upon Thames plan
1 times cited
SI5London Plan
1 times cited
LP8Richmond Upon Thames plan
1 times cited
46Amenity and Living ConditionsRichmond Upon Thames plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA25/3454
Householder Application
Approved
2026-04-14
PA25/0091
Full Application
Approved
2026-01-12
PA25/3454
Householder Application
Approved
2026-04-14
PA25/0091
Full Application
Approved
2026-01-12
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 9 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data

No named planning consultants on this officer's decided applications.

At a glance
OfficerLuca Pizzingrilli
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications9 (2024–26)
Approval rate89%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames planning register and published decision notices, 2024–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — Richmond Upon Thames's decision-notice parsing is limited coverage, so no borough or officer figure is shown.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.