Development Intent
Case officer · Tower Hamlets Planning

Enoch Ng.

Last recorded decision Aug 2022 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Tower Hamlets with an approval rate of 74% across 165 decided planning applications, spanning 11 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer165 decisions74% approvalSave
Tower Hamlets · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
165
Applications
2020–22
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%65%202071%202189%202250%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate74% · 56th of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Enoch Ng's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Enoch Ng decided — 122 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

S.DH3Heritage and the historic environmentTower Hamlets plan
33 times cited
D.DH2Attractive streets, spaces and public realmTower Hamlets plan
17 times cited
7.6Superseded
15 times cited
7.4Superseded
13 times cited
D.DH8AmenityTower Hamlets plan
13 times cited
D.TR3Parking and permit-free development requirementsTower Hamlets plan
11 times cited
NPPFNPPF
11 times cited
DH1SPD / guidance
9 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–22.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA/22/01348/A1
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-03-28
PA/22/01643/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2023-02-01
PA/22/01348/A1
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2023-03-28
PA/22/01643/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2023-02-01
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 165 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. ATP Architects + Surveyors Ltd
2. 4d Planning
3. Whittaker Parsons Ltd.
4. Gundry + Ducker
At a glance
OfficerEnoch Ng
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications165 (2020–22)
Approval rate74%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning register and published decision notices, 2020–22. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Tower Hamlets decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.