Development Intent
AtlasHammersmith and FulhamOfficersSerena Mann
Planning Atlas›Hammersmith And Fulham›Serena Mann
Case officer · Hammersmith And Fulham Planning

Serena Mann.

Active — last recorded decision Apr 2026

A case officer at Hammersmith And Fulham with an approval rate of 64% across 17 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer17 decisions64% approvalSave
Hammersmith And Fulham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
17
Applications
2021–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%67%202340%2024100%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate64% · 42nd of 45
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Serena Mann's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Serena Mann decided — 1 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DC1Built environment quality and integrationHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
DC4High standard of design for alterations and extensionsHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
DC8Heritage and conservation: Buildings at riskHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
HO1Housing Supply TargetsHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
T4Vehicle parking standards and permit-free developmentHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
CC11Noise and Vibration Control for DevelopmentsHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
CC13Control of potentially polluting uses and environmental nuisanceHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
CC2Sustainable Design and Construction in Major DevelopmentsHammersmith And Fulham plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
3
50%
3
100%
2
50%
2
50%
2
100%
1
–
1
100%
1
–
1
0%
1
–
3
50%
3
100%
2
50%
Show all 10 rows
2
50%
2
100%
1
–
1
100%
1
–
1
0%
1
–

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2025/02512/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-03-06
P/2026/00516/FUL
Full Planning Application
—
2026-02-27
2025/02512/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-03-06
P/2026/00516/FUL
Full Planning Application
—
2026-02-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 17 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr Benedict Baines / Pelican Architecture & Design
2. Mr Stephen Andrews / SDA Planning Ltd
3. Nick Jenkins / Smith Jenkins Planning & Heritage
4. Mr Ibrahim Oraha / Orahaus Ltd
At a glance
OfficerSerena Mann
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications17 (2021–26)
Approval rate64%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hammersmith And Fulham decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.