Development Intent
AtlasEalingOfficersChanti Boyle
Case officer · Ealing Planning

Chanti Boyle.

Recently active — last recorded decision Jul 2025

A case officer at Ealing with an approval rate of 93% across 165 decided planning applications, spanning 23 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer165 decisions93% approvalSave
Ealing · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
165
Applications
2023–25
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%86%202390%202498%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate93% · 3rd of 44
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports48 officer reports parsed
6%
Approves despite concerns
of approvals record a documented reservation
0%
Negotiated approvals
approvals mentioning revisions/amendments
0%
"On balance" reports
reports using explicit balancing language
54%
Bespoke reasoning
of report text written for the case, not recited
What they write about — vs Ealing's average officer

Topic mentions per 1,000 words of their own report text (boilerplate stripped), indexed against all parsed Ealing reports. Attention, not stance.

Transport & parking
1.28× borough avg
Character & heritage
0.61× borough avg
Outlook & amenity
0.47× borough avg

Mark = borough average (1×). Bar capped at 2×.

Assigned Chanti Boyle on a live case?What they pay attention to, how they reason, and what their reports consistently look for — so you can address it before they raise it.Subscribe to unlock →

Measured from 48 published Ealing officer reports written by this officer, with recited policy boilerplate stripped before any counting. These describe how this officer works and writes — they are not outcome predictions. Every quote is from a named public report.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most in their own reports — times cited across 48 parsed reports. Whether refusals citing each survive appeal isn't traced per policy yet.

D3
29 times cited
D4
29 times cited
D6
26 times cited
D5
17 times cited
D8
9 times cited
SP1
6 times cited
E1
5 times cited
HC1
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–25.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
244791FUL
Full Application
Approved
2025-12-17
250345FUL
Full Application
Approved
2025-08-14
244791FUL
Full Application
Approved
2025-12-17
250345FUL
Full Application
Approved
2025-08-14
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 165 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Faluck Raman Patel
2. Freedom Homes Architects
3. The Market Design and Build
4. Chalkline
At a glance
OfficerChanti Boyle
BoroughEaling
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications165 (2023–25)
Approval rate93%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Ealing planning register and published decision notices, 2023–25. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Ealing decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]"How this officer decides", the policy playbook and all quotes — parsed from 48 published Ealing officer reports written by this officer, recited policy boilerplate stripped before counting; disposition text coded from their own reasoning with every quote machine-verified verbatim. Descriptive of how they work — not outcome predictions.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.