David Hung.
Active — last recorded decision May 2026
A case officer at Ealing with an approval rate of 92% across 294 decided planning applications, spanning 24 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.
Topic mentions per 1,000 words of their own report text (boilerplate stripped), indexed against all parsed Ealing reports. Attention, not stance.
Mark = borough average (1×). Bar capped at 2×.
Hung consistently cites Ealing's DRAFT Local Plan (Regulation 19) policy DAA alongside the adopted London Plan D3/D4 pairing, treating the emerging local plan as an active material consideration even though it is unadopted, and names MULTIPLE specific comparator addresses together with their own planning permission reference numbers as precedent for scale, rather than a single example.
· cites Ealing's emerging/draft Local Plan (Regulation 19) Policy DAA as an active material consideration alongside the adopted London Plan D3/D4 pairing, even while it remains unadopted
· names multiple specific comparator addresses together with their own planning permission reference numbers as direct precedent for scale and design, rather than relying on a single example
· measures extension depth separately along each side boundary (e.g. eastern vs western) where a plot is non-rectangular, rather than quoting one overall depth figure
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: whether Ealing's draft Local Plan (Regulation 19) Policy DAA reinforces the adopted policy position, cited as an active (if unadopted) material consideration
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: multiple named comparator properties, each WITH its own specific planning permission reference number, rather than a single general claim of similar development nearby
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: separate depth measurements along each boundary of a non-rectangular plot rather than a single averaged figure
“Policy DAA of Ealing's draft Local Plan (Regulation 19) states development should ensure high quality design”
240552HH
“Several dwellings on Murray Road benefit from similar extensions including no. 37 (Ref: 223544FUL). No. 46 Carlyle Road (Ref: PP/2015/4660) and No. 44 Carlyle Road (Ref: 178752HH)”
242631HH
Measured from 118 published Ealing officer reports written by this officer, with recited policy boilerplate stripped before any counting. These describe how this officer works and writes — they are not outcome predictions. Every quote is from a named public report.
The policies this officer cites most in their own reports — times cited across 118 parsed reports. Whether refusals citing each survive appeal isn't traced per policy yet.
Show all 24 rows
Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.
- [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Ealing planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
- [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
- [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Ealing decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
- [4]"How this officer decides", the policy playbook and all quotes — parsed from 118 published Ealing officer reports written by this officer, recited policy boilerplate stripped before counting; disposition text coded from their own reasoning with every quote machine-verified verbatim. Descriptive of how they work — not outcome predictions.